Agreement Cheating

Education can go a long way in developing critical thinking, creativity, interpersonal and professional skills. However, these results cannot be achieved if students hire someone else for their work. This so-called “simple” way of getting good grades may be comfortable, but it is not safe. It complicates the true assessment of knowledge and skills among students. This type of fraud can also cause irreparable damage to the reputation of education systems. Why is contract fraud a major challenge for educators? What impact will this have on academic integrity? How can we stop them? Let us look at these issues and ways to combat this problem. In this article, we highlight a form of dishonest behaviour in science — contract fraud. We are investigating how an agreement between a student and a contract scammer of e… Kuntz, J. R.C.

and Butler, C. (2014). To study the individual and contextual precursors of attitudes towards the acceptance of fraud and plagiarism. Ethical Behav. 24, 478-494. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2014.908380 Essay-Màhlen have made contract fraud an economic model. They use powerful marketing and compelling techniques to attract the attention of potential consumers. Ads are shown on social networks, on the personal blogs of influencers and on other websites that young people visit while browsing the Internet.

Keywords: contract fraud, phantom writing, academic misconduct, university students, Rowland University students, S., Slade, C., Wong, K. and Whiting, B. (2018). “Just contact us”: the compelling features of contract fraud websites. evaluation. Eval. Upper Sukduc. 43, 652-665. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1391948 Newton, P. N.

(2018). What is the prevalence of commercial contract fraud in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Up front. 3:67. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00067 The term “contract fraud” was first coined by Clarke and Lancaster (2006). Contract fraud occurs when students employ or use a third party to take charge of their assessed work. While this is clearly not a “new” phenomenon, most commentators agree that there has been a global increase in contract fraud in all disciplines in recent years. This has increased the Community`s concerns about the credibility of university degrees and academic achievements, and has also changed the nature of academic integrity research.

Of particular concern is the dissemination of commercial marketing providers that bombard students via social networks, online platforms and other advertising forums through their “academic services”. In the United Kingdom, the Quality Assurance Agency published a report[57] in which it advocated the application of a legal approach as a means of combating contract fraud and suggested that existing fraud laws could be enforced, since the activities of these services and their customers could reasonably be interpreted to associate them with definitions of fraud, as they contain misrepresentation and undisclosed information. A subsequent research project[58] compared UK fraud legislation to the terms and conditions used by contract fraud services and concluded that such services would probably not be contrary to the Fraud Act, since the exclusions, conditions and conditions of liability provided by the services generally justify that all custom written products can only be used as “study guides” or “review assistants,” giving the student responsibility and intent.